Welcome to the self-proclaimed Rural Ottawa High-Speed Internet Blog. High-speed Internet access is virtually ubiquitous in the urban and suburban areas of Ottawa, but when I started this blog in 2005, only about 60% of the rural areas of Ottawa have coverage. However, even for rural citizens, high-speed Internet access is becoming as necessary as telephone service. Happily, high-speed coverage for rural Ottawa has increased significantly, and not only is coverage reportedly above 90%, many rural residents and businesses now have more than one choice of high-speed ISP.

This purpose of this weblog is to track news and events related to high-speed (broadband) Internet access in the rural areas of Ottawa and, to a lesser extent, in nearby townships.

RSS Feed

I think members of this blog can be notified of any new postings via email. Membership is free (and I won't spam you). As well, if you have an RSS news reader, you can easily be notifed of new postings to this blog by subscribing to: http://firstlinehs.blogspot.com/atom.xml

Postings & Moderation

I've opened up this blog to allow anyone to post to it. However, I continue to moderate and will remove any inappropriate content, e.g. anything not related to high-speed internet access in the rural Ottawa, the Ottawa Valley, Eastern Ontario, and the Outaouais.


Friday, July 30, 2010

Where is SimplySurf?

Over the last couple of days, I've been told by a couple of people on this blog that SimplySurf no longer appears to be providing wireless service. From comments posted under my Rogers Rocket Hub blog entry, it seems that the company may be out-of-business. After doing a bit of searching on Google, I wasn't able to confirm or deny whether or not SimplySurf was still operational. So I guess at this point, given the comments I've received, it is alleged that SimplySurf is gone.

From 'Firefox',

"...things were fine up until the end of May here, and the one day the towers started dropping off the network to the point where I had no connectivity for 4 or 5 days.

After leaving them [SimplySurf] numerous voice messages, I finally caved and and drove to their office location at lunch to find an emptied out office building with a nasty looking notice from Ottawa hydro stuck in the door. Not good.

Anyways - suffice it to say that I have not been able to contact them over email, phone or fax since the end of May..."


And from 'PA',

"I also live in West Carleton and use SimplySurf. Service is extremely unreliable and support/service is non existent. I can live with the occasional outage, but no service at all is not acceptable. One of my neighbours, who was also using SimplySurf, got feed up and dropped them. Problem is that he couldn’t contact them to tell them he had switched to Xplornet, he just had to cancel the monthly payments..."


If anyone has any other info about SimplySurf, I'm sure readers of this blog would like to hear it.

-Chris

39 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Posting this through my SimplySurf connection. (March Rd, West Carleton)
It's been working very well for the past couple months.Just received a billing statement from them on Friday.

August 01, 2010 9:21 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We've had problems with their service since mid July but just checked with our neighbors and it is working fine for them.

I can confirm that the office near Carling & Moodie is completely empty of furniture, though the sign is still up.

Posting over the dial-up service I never got around to cancelling (never did get added to the service provided by Simply Surf).

August 10, 2010 8:16 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

March/Bearhill (Sierra Woods)location. I've had the same problems with SS lately. I did have their dialup for backup, but for the past several months, it no longer works (domain name problem). They never return my phone calls or emails, but have no problem processing my VISA payment! And they've upped the monthly fee with no advance notice.

Remembering the Arryba situation, where they simply shut down and left their customers hanging, I'm considering the Rogers Rocket Hub. The closest tower is Richardson Side Rd./417 vicinity but there's a massive wall of 60' pines across the street and I'm wondering how strong the signal would be. After all the $$ it cost me to hook up to SS, I'm leery of forking out more $$ for another antenna.

In the meantime, I'm thinking of going back to 295.ca dialup as a backup in case SS suddenly goes belly-up.

August 22, 2010 8:33 am  
Blogger Chris Spencer said...

Apparently, Rogers sells a high-gain antenna for their Rocket Hub, but I don't know the cost. I keep meaning to wander into the Rogers store in Barhaven but haven't had a chance to do that so far.

Aside: When Arryba imploded, it was uncertain for a while. It took a month or so for Storm to step in. However, during that time, I don't recall having or hearing of service problems. But, as I understand it, Arryba fell due to in-fighting and disagreements among the partners rather than financial issues; I could be wrong, but that is what I heard.

-Chris

August 22, 2010 9:01 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whatever reason Arryba failed, the end result for the customer was the same. If Storm hadn't stepped in, they'd have been SOL.

In the meantime, SS's firing on all cylinders this am. My connection was down from Friday evening to Saturday pm, then again Saturday evening to early Sunday am. It's the increasing unreliability of the system plus the complete lack of communication/customer service that's so unsettling.

Anyone in Sierra Woods using Rogers Rocket Hub?

August 22, 2010 11:09 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sierra Woods resident & SS client here with an update. I've purchased the Rogers Rocket Hub. It's a new model(Nexcomm 3G10WVR), not the one shown on their website. As advertised, plugged it into wall and ethernet and shortly thereafter had a signal. I'm on the 3G network, but only getting a low signal. Doing Speedtest, my download is anywhere from 2-4mbs, upload usually 1.++, but the big difference is in the PING - SS is usually mid-40s, Rogers mid 100s but speedtest rates Rogers way better than SS. Supposedly an antenna would improve speed.

Bell Turbo Hub is on 10-14 day backorder, they're still selling the Ericsson unit so I can't try it out right now for comparison.

I'm probably not going to keep the Rocket right now, but it's good to know there's an option.

I have a family member waiting for the Bell unit; when she gets it, I'll borrow it and see what kind of connection I get. I'll post it here in case inquiring minds want to know.

Regarding SS closing their Ullswater office, I wonder if they've consolidated at 27 Auriga Dr. (Monicorp/Monisys). It's a family business. If anyone works in that area, it might be worth checking to see if they're still at Unit 33.

August 26, 2010 8:37 pm  
Anonymous Mark - Howie Rd said...

I subscribed to Simplysurf when they expanded their service out to Howie Rd/Manion/etc (Oct 2006). I just looked back at my email trail and they were very unresponsive even back then. Simplysurf (or Monicorp) was Shadi and Sharouk Hussein - a brother/sister team.

My throughput initially was 3.5 Mbps, then dropped to about 2.5 Mbps in late 2007 and then to about 1.5 Mbps in late 2008. The service was generally reliable although there were frequent, sporadic outages. I say generally reliable, because there were times when throughput would drop so low that dial-up would have been faster, plus their APs would go up and down like a yo-yo. Well, that's how it was...

We totally lost all connectivity with Simplysurf at 9:20 am on Tuesday Sep 14th. The AP actually has no power to it. I called Simplysurf numerous times with zero response, as per their usual business practice. (I do know the back story behind how the AP lost power, but I'm not willing to post it publicly.)

Today (Fri Sep 17) I drove to their new office location, "Suite 33, 27 Auriga Dr" hoping to get some answers. What I found at 27 Auriga Drive was a self-storage building that rents boxes - so "Suite" 33 is Box 33, which is rented to Monicorp. I took a printed copy of an email that said I withdrew my authorization to charge my Visa. I wrote "hand delivered" on it and asked one of the guys to put the email in their mailbox - which he did (the mailbox was not stuffed so I presume they pick up their mail). I commented that I hoped they were prepaid for the box rental. :)

I think there is zero hope of ever finding them in person again and effectively zero hope in them getting their act together to fix things up. That's too bad, as Simplysurf was the first to provide fixed wireless high speed to rural customers (and no data cap too!) and they could easily have been really successful. However, Shadi and Sharouk are obviously very poor at the technical end of things as well as on the business side, and frankly they deserve to go out of business. It's just unfortunate that we subscribers are the collateral damage.

Postscript: About the $ initial investment: Yes, I invested a lot in the equipment for SS too, but I consider to broken even compared to the alternatives. Even now, the Bell Turbo Hub/Rogers Rocket Hub costs $185 ($150 + $35 activation) and that's with a discount for a 2-year contract for a higher monthly bill and teeny tiny throughput cap.

Posted via 295.ca dial-up (none of the other alternate providers are applicable to me :(.)

September 17, 2010 8:00 pm  
Anonymous Mark - Howie Rd said...

Did you get my previous long comment about Simplysurf? I got an error message but i also got a message that it was pending moderation.

On LinkedIn, Shadi Hussein says he is Systems Engineer at InfoExpress since March 2010, concurrent with Network Engineer at SimplySurf since April 2004. http://ca.linkedin.com/in/shadih

The whois record for monisys says (same administrative contact):
Technical contact:
Name: Shadi Hussein
Job Title: President
Postal address: 1800 Bank Street Suite 307 Ottawa ON K1V 0W3 Canada
Phone: +1 613 688 1404
Fax: +1 613 688 1406
Email: shadi@monisys.ca

Shadi is also listed as the technical contact for the fogdoctor.com domain name/ The info is as above but with dom-reg@monisys.ca email address. The owner and administrative contact for fogdoctor.com is:
Administrative Contact:
Stephen Collins
Stephen Collins
11-4200 Riverside Dr
Ottawa, ON K`V 1C4
US
Phone: +1.6136922293
Email: amanak1@sympatico.ca

September 18, 2010 1:09 am  
Blogger Chris Spencer said...

@Mark,

As stated in the intro blurb on my blog's mainpage, I moderate all comments on my blog. I used to leave it open, but got some really nasty comments as well as many irrelevant ones (I'm not sure what discounted knock-off viagra has to do with rural high-speed Internet access). It can take me more than a day to get around to reviewing and publishing comments.

-Chris

September 18, 2010 4:33 pm  
Anonymous Mark - Howie Rd said...

@Chris - no problem with the comment moderation, I just wasn't sure if you actually received it because of the error message I got when I submitted.

BTW, you should take the Look communications link off your list of ISPs. Look went bankrupt last year and the assets were bought out by Rogers and Bell.

September 18, 2010 8:33 pm  
Blogger FireFox said...

Hi Chris,

I too visited the new SimplySurf "Office" when they charged my credit card for the 3rd time after sending them my cancellation letter. Luckily I had informed VISA at the same time to no longer accept charges from them, but after 3 chargebacks I was getting so tired of the dance. I finally printed out the various letters I had sent them and the copies I sent to the credit card company and sent it to them via registered mail with signature required. It was accepted and the cancellation finally seems to have taken. What a disaster.

I agree with Marks comment that on one hand it is sad to see them fall since they were the first ones to service the WestCarleton areas. But, to be honest, I think that the writing has been on the wall for SimplySurf for some time with the combination of customer service and Explornet winning the city initiative.

Im not far from Mark (Manion Heights) and I know that every SimplySurf subscriber I have talked to in the neighbourhood has bailed on them due to flakiness of the connection -- what good is an internet connection if its not working when you need it.

Fox

September 22, 2010 3:34 pm  
Anonymous Mark - Howie Rd said...

I haven't heard any more from Simplysurf, and am now hooked up with Xplornet. Am not too impressed with their "up to 5 Mbps" service because it seems to cap out around 1.1 to 1.5 Mbps - worse than SS for twice the price. Not unlike SS, I had an outage with Xplornet on Sunday morning for over an hour (the modem was saying scanning/ syncing/ registering...), and only "registered" when I was actually on the phone with Xplornet tech (something I never experienced with SS). That was my 2nd experience with Xplorenet support and I find the techs pretty rude, actually. The person I spoke with blamed my equipment (router/ether switch) for the troubles. Although she did acknowledge that my equipment would have no bearing on the modem not registering she said she was going to put a note on my account not to provide any tech support unless I changed my Xplornet connection to only connect to one computer. :(

But prior to getting Xplornet, I contacted the folks at goZoom about 2 wks ago and found they don't service this area. They did a quick survey and found that most of the SS customers had bailed and were locked into 2 or 3 year contracts with Bell, Rogers, or Xplornet, so there was no business case for them to expand here.

I had also suggested to goZoom that perhaps they might be able to buy up SS's assets and customers for pennies on the dollar - presumably Shadi would like to recover some money from his investment... But after reviewing the SS installations that they could find, they decided against it... Here's a quote "BTW We located 3 x SS AP's; only one had a 'good' location, and none were mounted close to industry spec - for example none of the 2.4 GHz Omni's are mounted at least 1/4 wavelength from the nearest vertical surface (the tower) So they would all suffer from tower coupling in the near field - I'm surprised it ever worked, and little wonder it was unstable."

I guess that explains a LOT of things... :(

September 27, 2010 10:42 pm  
Blogger Chris Spencer said...

@Mark...

Xplornet shouldn't be giving you any grief about having the modem connected to a router. I've been with them for 2+ years, and have had a router the whole time and they know about it. Heck, I even had a second-level tech spend 45 minutes helping me with my new router about 3 weeks ago (static IP was pointing to my old router's MAC address).

However, during troubleshooting, they may ask you to connect a PC directly to the modem, to rule out any chance of the router being the problem. This is pretty standard troubleshooting, regardless of ISP.

You mention that the 5 Mbps service is topping-out at 1-1.5 Mbps. I'm not sure if your situation is anything like mine, but one thing I've consistently noticed with Xplornet is that I get the best speeds on my 3 Mbps service during business hours and late evening, but it really drops off between ~4:30pm and 10pm -- I guess that's when kids get home from school and people get home from work and start surfing. Since the bandwidth on the towers is shared amongst all users, you may notice slow downs during primetime.

-Chris

September 27, 2010 11:16 pm  
Anonymous Mark - Howie Rd said...

@Chris - xplornet has been horrible, with huge connectivity and low xfer speeds. I've called the xplornet tech support every day since the service was installed. I agree that what the techs have told me is stupid - saying their service is for one computer only is ridiculous especially since their web site says setting up routers etc isn't included in the standard installation fee. Fortunately this evening I got a tech who was able to look at things and say my signal was very weak. He was going to send a message to the installer to come and check it out and maybe switch me to the 3.5 GHz radios.

I have no connectivity as I write this (9:35pm). Since about 2:45pm today,I have had 15 outages (including right now), totaling about 3:30 hours (in 7:10)... The most annoying thing is when it connects for a minute or 2 or 3, and then out for 10...

Now waiting for connectivity so I can Publish... (finally.. 10:57pm)

September 28, 2010 10:58 pm  
Anonymous tired-of-poor-internet-service said...

Writing from the Sierra Woods area using my 295.ca account. SimplySurf has been down since yesterday (Oct 16) morning. There is no wifi signal from the tower. Maybe this is the end. Looking at the alternatives, the download caps are a concern.
I'm going to look into the Bell Turbo Hub tomorrow.

October 17, 2010 9:16 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another Sierra Woods resident here. I still have my SS modem connected and also noticed it's been dead for the past two days but is back up tonight (Sunday). So now we're all waiting for the other shoe to drop and SS to finally pack it in.

I've been using the Bell Turbo Hub for the past month. Although I'm mostly getting two bars and 3G+, sometimes it takes a looong time to connect to the internet and it times out. Although the Bell tower is Shanna/Vaughn Rd. vicinity, I think it's all the trees in between that are the problem. I'm thinking of putting up an antenna if I can find someone to climb up on my roof to connect the thing.

If you're already a Bell customer, you qualify for the $5/mo bundle discount, but if you're a heavy You-tuber or have kids into gaming or downloading videos, you're going to have to drastically change your lifestyle or pay through the nose for anything over 10GB. Check one of the forums for Guitarmaniak's experience! And don't leave the unit connected to the internet when you're offline - put it on standby or you'll be running up the meter. 295.ca dialup, Rogers Rocket Hub or BTH, it's gonna be a big change.

October 17, 2010 10:57 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In regards to the outage in Sierra Woods this week, I had left a voicemail message and sent an email (over dial-up). Much to my surprise, I actually received a response acknowledging the outage as related to a database server problem.

It's been working fine since Sunday night.

October 19, 2010 9:51 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

With regards to the outage last week-end, the outage appears to be to the complete SS network as we experienced the same outage in the Dunrobin area. I should note that the owners (Shadi & Sharouk) are from Montreal and spends their week ends there. There is nobody in Ottawa to maintain the SS network on week ends.

October 21, 2010 7:56 am  
Anonymous Mark - Howie Rd said...

It's been almost a month since I signed up for Xplornet and thought I would drop by to give an update on my experience.

I was on the verge of canceling Xplornet as there were so many outages - would be disconnected for about 45% of the day and really bad throughput for a good chunk of the rest.

On my last call, the Xplornet tech (about a month ago) said he could see I had very poor signal strength which was the likely cause of the problem. The installer hadn't installed the reflector dish because he could easily see the tower and had good signal strength when he first connected us. After the reflector dish was installed, the extensive outages have disappeared. I do still get disconnected on occasion and the sluggish connection is always there on the weekends and evenings.

Overall, I'm satisfied with Xplornet. The speed is roughly equivalent to what I had with SimplySurf and it costs 2x as much, but at least there is tech support if there is an outage!!!

October 23, 2010 5:04 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

For those of you who still have SimplySurf for Wireless Internet Access, a number of things have happened over the past few days leading one to believe that SimplySurf no longer exists in its past incarnation.

Please note that these comments are solely based on my personal observations and experiences -- of course, :-( there has been no formal communication from SimplySurf.

Yesterday, I tried to ftp (file transfer protocol) access one of my web sites and discovered I couldn't access it. (It was fine a few days earlier). My remote security firewall only allowed ftp access to those web sites from address starting with: 204.225.249.* (SimplySurf's former address range) A quick check showed that my IP Address was now: 72.1.220.249 -- part of the Ottawa Telecom address range. Similarly, the SimplySurf mail server is now at 72.1.220.232, also no longer part of the SimplySurf network and part of the Ottawa Telecom Internet numbering hierarchy.

As you may know, Ottawa Telecom was the former City-owned company that covered the Ottawa Region with fibre-optic cable, and used by SimplySurf to connect its subscribers to the world.

About two years ago, Telecom Ottawa was bought out by Atria Networks (who have purchased an number of cities' local fibre networks). About a month ago, Rogers Communications announced its purchase of Atria, which means that SimplySurf is ultimately going to be subsumed by Rogers.

But without any former notification from anybody, who knows for sure... But that's my take as of Friday AM.

What a way to run a business...rbh

November 13, 2010 11:23 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Basil123ON, what's the significance of this for us lay people? I was with SS but got fed up with the outages and no feedback from the owners. I cancelled my VISA debit in September and emailed SS notifying them of same. They still send me invoices and they haven't cancelled my service although I'm now using Bell Turbo Hub. Nice to have backup though ;}

November 16, 2010 4:58 pm  
Anonymous tired-of-poor-internet-service said...

Nov 16th - SS has been down for over 10 hours now, it died at around 11:30 AM. (using dial-up to write this)
This looks similar to the October outage, no signal from the AP. Of course their support line is as helpful as always :(

November 16, 2010 10:03 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

Just a note that SimplySurf or Monicorp is no longer providing wireless service. The service that disappeared recently probably won't be coming back. Too bad...

I ordered my Ericsson W35 Rocket Hub today -- with a $55 cap on top of the maximum quoted rate -- that means that data will never exceed $110/mo + taxes etc.

Only in Canada, you say...

November 17, 2010 3:47 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just another datapoint - we've been without service since Tuesday 11/17 in Torwood Estates (Greenland Rd b/w Vances and Armitage out past Dunrobin). Modem is just scanning....

Will be looking into alternatives immediately.
-Chris A

November 18, 2010 10:00 am  
Anonymous tired-of-poor-internet-service said...

not quite dead yet...

On http://simplysurf.net/

November 18, 2010
We are currently experiencing an outage in our Dunrobin and Carp service areas. We are working hard with other local ISPs to bring our service back online as quickly as possible.


Anybody know what that means??

November 18, 2010 4:36 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tired,

They're probably scrambling to find someone to take over their dwindling client base. I was surprised to see the notice on their web site, that's got to be the first concession they've made to their customers in a long while, but if you couldn't connect, how would you know? I gave up calling or emailing them months ago as I never got any acknowledgement.

I notice the email server is back up today so maybe that signifies something.

November 20, 2010 9:49 am  
Anonymous Mark - Howie Rd said...

Email received Nov 19, 12:16pm:

November 19, 2010

Dear SimplySurf Subscriber,

We are currently experiencing a network outage which started on Tuesday, November 16 at approximately 11:35 AM. This outage is related to our upstream provider, and we immediately started searching for alternate sources of connectivity.

We are working closely with another local ISP in hopes of re-establishing connectivity this weekend. We will provide updates throughout our progress, and we hope to have the network back online as soon as possible.

We truly apologize for this terrible inconvenience, and we would like to again thank each of you for your generous support over the years.
Thank you.

SimplySurf Support


I suspect that the network outage was due to SS being cut off by their upstream provider for non-payment. That's just a wild guess, of course.

November 20, 2010 5:53 pm  
Anonymous tired-of-poor-internet-servic said...

Sunday Nov 21
There is a truck with a gozoom logo and a van with an Xplornet logo at the Jacob's Gate AP. A tech has been installing hardware near the top of the tower.

November 21, 2010 12:52 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Apparently they're still trying to get a backhaul running with gozoom.

November 23, 2010 3:32 pm  
Anonymous Ian Fraser said...

We considered assuming the SS-Corkery area.

I had 2 techs working on backhaul to the Carp Tower two days in November but We were unable to provide sufficient bandwidth to Jacob's gate. I suspect a Fresnel edge refraction at the peak of March road, near the golf course was the cause. None of our other towers are within range of Jacob's Gate and none of the other SS installations provide LOS to anywhere that we can hit.

xPlornet was at Jacob's gate to hook the homeowner up because I had told him that we would not likely be successful in establishing the backhaul.

Again Yesterday (Dec 4th) I spent 3 hours with a fellow who has significant knowledge of the SS network in that area and, unfortunately, none of it is to our standards or even close really.

Many AP's/backhauls are mounted to Trees. All appear to be bridged on Point to Multi Point connections (very bad). Passwords are unknown. Customer count, and/or location are unknown. A LOT of connections are on 2.4 GHz through heavy foliage, and most customers appear to be using Nortel 'Accumen' radios, which is a 4 year old architecture based on a x86 SBC. By my understanding the Accumen was a mesh topology designed for Campus type deployment. The fact that you have to run 120 VAC (yikes) to the radio itself indicates that it was meant for light posts, not tower deployment, and definitely not a rural mesh. Mind you a tree is mostly non-conductive so the 1/4 wave rule doesn't apply (LOL). As well Shadi has not responded to our requests for information.

The end conclusion is that none of the gear is reusable by us, and due to the very late 'notification' from SS as to the situation it's highly unlikely that there are any customers left. Also xPlornet has the NLOS frequency's in the area completely saturated and the 900MHz noise floor is -70 !!, making our NLOS gear useless.... We don't have Licensing for 3.65 GHz (WiMax) in the 'City of Ottawa' so the only option would be a repeat of what's there - and that's not how we build a reliable network.

Sorry, as much as I would like to help out, there's just no business case left for the Corkery area.

I do know that NorthWind Wireless has managed to connect the other half of SS (Dunrobin) to their backhaul so there may be options for SS customers on the North Side of the Carp ridge. Unfortunately Dunrobin cannot backhaul for Corkery.

Cheers,
Ian Fraser
CEO goZoom.ca Inc.
877.622.0093
info [@] gozoom[dot]ca
www.gozoom.ca

December 05, 2010 7:24 am  
Anonymous Country Mouse said...

We're trying to obtain from Shadi, codes that will permit us to use the modems we bought from him and are now useless without said codes. 'we' being a group of neighhbours.
As well, we are exploring diligently (once bitten, twice shy), a unique solution with a consortium of neighbours.
I understand some former SS customers in Dunrobin are up in arms. Might any of them be on this list? Has anyone contacted the media on this?

December 09, 2010 11:21 am  
Blogger Hughman said...

Well finally, North Wind has come in and replaced the simply surf equipment on the tower on my house with their equipment. I now have High Speed Internet back up, after being down since Nov 18th. I know they are trying to reverse the back haul from the river to Dunrobin, I was the second leg on the journey from the river. Located at 3494 Greenland Road. Any former SimplySurf customers in the area should contact North Wind http://northwindwireless.com/

December 09, 2010 11:20 pm  
Anonymous Joly@ca.inter.net said...

I am a resident of Torwood Estate near Dunrobin and also a former customer of SS. I have now been hooked up to Northwind Wireless for the better part of two weeks and the internet has run flawlessly, no interruptions or stoppages of any kind. Great service, good performance, and they actually answer the phone. I understand they will expand their services in Dunrobin and area within the next week or so.

December 11, 2010 3:33 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

Friday morning (10 Dec), two trucks from NorthWind Wireless and a crane arrived in Dunrobin Heights. NorthWind is replacing the obsolete/discontinued Nortel access points and other hardware with new equipment. It appears that the NorthWind Wireless has had a meeting of minds with SimplySurf, and have assumed responsibility for the part of the SS network in areas including Dunrobin Village, Dunrobin Heights, Eagle Creek and Torwood. If the weather cooperates, all the previous system components will be replaced by this coming Friday (17 Dec) or so. Currently, much of the system is powered up and is undergoing tests; some installations have begun.

NorthWind Wireless has been providing Internet for about seven years and currently serves both sides of the Ottawa River from about Fitzroy Harbour to Berry Side Road (near the south end of Constance Lake), plus an area of about a one-Km radius of Stonecrest E.S (Stonecrest Rd and Kinburn Side Road).

Rather than connect to the world using the Atria (formerly Ottawa Telecom) (soon to be Rogers) FOTS (fibre-optics transmission system) from near the West Carleton Secondary School (north of Dunrobin Village), NorthWind Wireless'routing is across the Ottawa River, connecting with FOTS on the Quebec side. This should provide an improved quality of service as greater bandwidth will be available.

Once the system is tested and working, Northwind will be offering old SimplySurf subscribers free installation with three available speed tiers of service: 1.5 Mbps (megabits per second), 2.5 Mbps and 3.5 Mbps. There are no usage caps and no traffic shaping.

The NorthWind web site has lots of additional information:

http://northwindwireless.com/

By the way, since losing SS in November, we tried:

* Our backup V.92 dial-up -- about 40 Kbps -- strictly a last resort.

* Rogers RocketHub -- half the speed of our dial-up, even with a strong signal -- Rogers' techs admit severe network congestion.

* XploreNet 3 Mbps service (using 900 Mhz from Torwood area) we have never had faster than about 2 Mbps down and 400 Kbps up -- typically, about half that. Overloaded, it seems. Also, we receive an average of 8000 stateless ICMP attacks daily from all over the Xplorenet system (blocked by our hardware firewall) -- perhaps the Smurf Denial of Service attack. When the problem was reported, Xplorenet agreed to have the issue fixed in less than a week, but so far, the problem still exists. Quality of service is typically less than 20%, commonly with interruptions or pauses (latency) of up to two seconds. Better than dial-up but it does throttle back a lot if one is trying to download a large file.

When it worked, the old SS service was far superior to all the others. I expect that the with more bandwidth, service from NorthWind should be better still.

To "kick the tires", bring your laptop to the Lighthouse Restaurant in Constance Bay, have a coffee and try the wireless service using the installed hot-spot.

We should be hooked up to NorthWind in a few days -- I'll report back then, including support aspects (which are very important) -- but they do answer their phone and return calls -- a great improvement!

December 14, 2010 10:05 am  
Anonymous tired-of-poor-internet-service said...

Here in Sierra Woods I tried a Rogers Rockethub and found it worked well, but it's just not practical for me. It would cost at least $60 for the included 10GB plus the unpublished $50 max for $10/GB in excess. So $110 per month and the worry that the $50 max could disappear at any time for 15 GB/month doesn't add up. I returned it and am now using 3.5Ghz Enhanced 3Mb Xplornet service. As expected *sigh*, it has slower speed and higher latency for more money than SS. It looks like we're too far from Northwind's coverage footprint so sadly our only choices here are the 3G hubs and Xplornet.

December 14, 2010 4:01 pm  
Blogger FireFox said...

Hi Chris,

Thanks again for running this blog so that we can hear interesting stories like the zoom.ca attempt to reconnect SS customers in the south carp region and the northwind wireless connections in the Durobin area.

In my area (Corkery) almost the previous SS customers I have chatted with have switched to Rogers Rocket hub or Xplornet. Seems that for most people they were happier with SS even with the non-existant support, with a major comment being that the new services are quite a bit pricier than the ~ $30 / month from SS.

I saw this disturbing report on Xplornet changing their network managment policies

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r25191677-Xplornet-is-adding-CAPS-to-their-traffic-management-policy-

which if this is true - would be a real downer for Xplornet customers.

Personally my Rogers connection is more reliable and for the most part faster then I had with SS, but I know I was on the fringe of the SS service area before and others in the neighbourhood had much better service. I still do hope that maybe some other ISP will bring service to the Corkery region, but after reading the summary from Ian @ Zoom.ca that doesnt appear likely.

Fox.

December 15, 2010 10:07 am  
Blogger Unknown said...

Hi Chris,

I spoke with Xplornet. Currently, the caps are for everything except 900 MHz services (at least at present).

My call was because that I'm concerned about my 1 GB or so of "Stateless ICMP packets" my firewall blocks daily from other sites on the Xplornet network -- with a 1-GB/day cap (with my 3-Mbps service, I'll be ending up paying for an expensive dial-up system!

Basil

December 15, 2010 4:23 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

Hi Chris,
We were wirelessly connected to NorthWind Wireless today (Monday, in Dunrobin Heights).

First impressions: With NorthWind Wireless, Average down speed between 3 to 4 Mbps solid -- up direction, a bit faster. Latency was low (good). Better than SS and XN.

I alternated testing between our "3 Mbps Xplornet service" and NorthWind -- Xplornet gave about 840 kbps down, and 220 Kbps up -- about 1/10th the speed as NorthWind for a similar price. The best latency/pauses measured on XN was nearly 2 seconds (bad).

I did tests all over North America using a variety of test agents. Tests to places like NYC, DC, Montreal etc. were great using NorthWind. Sometimes Xplornet was nearly like dialup...

Tech support: You call NWW's phone number, you get answered by a knowledgeable person (not a droid or machine). They are helpful, courteous and pleasant.

I did serious downloads, real-time video streaming with NWW and nary a hiccup or sputter -- with XN, even a trivial streaming video ALWAYS sputters.

A rhetorical question for XN -- XN are bragging to new customers that everything will be faster next year when they convert to "4G" (the next greatest wireless evolution). But then, why the bandwidth cap coming March 1st, Hmmm???

Later as experience dictates.

Basil

December 20, 2010 5:15 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

Update: NorthWind Wireless Performance (West Carleton area)

Overall, with nearly a month's experience, we are pleased with the performance from NWW. Most of the time, we have a near-symmetrical (similar bit rate up and down) service between 2-Mbps and 3-Mbps. At the same time, the QoS (quality of service) is generally >90% -- the system works flawlessly for VoIP (voice over Internet protocol). VoIP was mostly unusable on SS, the previous provider.

We have never had an instance when the service was not of "adequate" quality. There has been no sign of usage capping or speed throttling.

Regarding reliability, we have not had even a momentary blip with NWW whereas with SS, there was at least one short outage on a daily basis.

Also, their support seems to be good so far.

We still have (so-called "3 Mbps") Xplornet, but it's only there as a backup, it is better than V.92 dial-up for sending e-mail and light web surfing, but is pretty much hopeless (becomes very slow and/or has high latency) if one is trying to download a 200 MB software update from MS or stream video... Xplornet's forthcoming bandwidth caps on 1 March are also going to be an inconvenience for many -- they are imposing a major change to the service definition!

Cheers,

Basil

January 16, 2011 2:03 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Rogers Rocket Hub

Someone told me about Rogers Rocket Hub offering, which allows to you to connect up to 10 PCs into a home network and, if you want, add in your home phone as well. There are flexible rate plans based on your data usage and whether or not you want to have voice services as well.

Although the above web page doesn't give maximum download and upload rates, if you poke around on Rogers' mobile Internet site, the maximum speeds seem to be 7.2 Mbps down and 5.7 Mbps up. It's on Rogers' HSPA 3.5G wireless network.

This all looks very good (e.g. faster peak speeds for less than I'm paying now). Does anyone out there have any details on this service? I know a few people have told me that Rogers Rocket stick is quite good, and this offering seems to be built around the same service.

-Chris

27 Comments:

Blogger Chris Spencer said...

OK, my bad. Someone did previously comment on Rogers Rocket Hub. See the comment dated February 8, 2010 in posting Opinions on Mobile Internet.

If that anonymous poster could provide an update, that would be great.

July 13, 2010 10:42 am  
Anonymous Geo in Metcalfe said...

I just picked one of the new model (NetComm 3G10WVR) Rocket Hubs this week.
I live about 6km outside of Metcalfe and have been stuck with Xplornet. That service at the best of times will give 2.8Mbps/download and 0.5Mbps/upload, but I find it isn't consistent enough as sometimes my download is as low as 0.4Mbps and the latency makes PS3 gaming really suffer.
With the Rocket Hub the best spot in my house is on a shelf in a 2nd story bedroom (2 out of 5 bars) and anywhere else in the house is 1 bar. The speeds I'm getting are similar to the Xplornet but slightly less @ 2.1Mbps/download and 0.5Mbps/upload.
Only had it running for 2 days but the thing I like is the consistency. So far never any slower speeds. PS3 gaming, I've never been dropped from a server where with Xplornet sometimes I'd only get in 1 full game in 3 hours of play.
I also believe there may be an option for an external antenna which should only help.
So not the speeds that are promised, at least not in my rural area but if you get at least 2 bars you're getting a consistent connection. I have 15 days to try and return if I don't like it so I'll post again in a week and let you know how it went.

July 16, 2010 10:20 am  
Anonymous Geo in Metcalfe said...

Well, after the 15 days I've decided to keep the Rocket Hub. It does not (in my rural area) provide anywhere close to the speeds advertised. I would say my average download speed is 1.3Mbps and upload is 0.4Mbps. But it is consistent and I was only dropped from PS3 gaming once.
I spoke with Rogers tech support and it was suggested I get a High Gain Directional Antenna which should boost the signal and increase the speeds.
Also note that it will support at best 2 multimedia access at a time (gaming & YouTube).
So many limitations but when it's that or Xplornet, I'll take the slower speeds & consistency.

July 27, 2010 9:49 am  
Blogger Chris Spencer said...

Geo in Metcalfe...

I (and many other readers I'm sure) would be interested in hearing how things go with the high gain antenna.

For myself here between Manotick and Kars, I'm actually getting pretty good speeds with Xplornet... especially during daytime when I'm working from home and need speed the most. Evening speeds are wildly variable, perhaps depending on website or shared bandwidth.

-Chris

July 27, 2010 8:41 pm  
Blogger FireFox said...

Hi Chris,

First off, great blog you are running here. Ive kept an eye on it for some time and always found it informative.

Im located in West Carleton / Carp and since 2006 I have been a SimplySurf subscriber since they were the first to deploy in our neighbourhood. The service wasnt always the best and technical support was always a nightmare with them. Anyways - things were fine up until the end of May here, and the one day the towers started dropping off the network to the point where I had no connectivity for 4 or 5 days.

After leaving them numerous voice messages, I finally caved and and drove to their office location at lunch to find an emptied out office building with a nasty looking notice from Ottawa hydro stuck in the door. Not good.

Anyways - suffice it to say that I have not been able to contact them over email, phone or fax since the end of May and am searching for a new provider for service.

Seems that the choices arent all that great .

1) Xplornet is the logical choice, but they have a 3 year contract required and their network shaping policy of cutting the connection speed to 20-30% of the advertised speeds after ~30 seconds of transfer regardless of how busy the network actually is seems very un-broadband to me.

2) Rogers / Bell WiMAX : You have mentioned this service on the blog here a few times and it does seem like it might fit the bill. Looking around on other net access forums seems to turn up a number of unhappy customers (and a lot in the Ottawa area due to tower overloading) that seems to indicate that this technology is already on the way out the door and that new improvements on this service are coming.

3) Rocket Hub. One of the neighbors (also ex-SimplySurf) has this device and seems quite pleased with it. The RocketHub makes me leery is the low bandwith caps on the service. I do use the connection for work and sometimes that means downloading large software images for testing and I think I would burn through 10 gb pretty quickly.

If anyone else has any experience with any of these 3 services recently - it would be appreciated.

Probably like everyone else reading this site, I just wish for the day that Bell upgrades the phone infrastructure in my neighbourhood and makes DSL a possibility. Until then I will have to choose one of the flawed solutions and deal with the flakiness of wireless.

Thanks for listening. :)

Fox

July 29, 2010 4:25 pm  
Blogger Chris Spencer said...

Hey Firefox.

Thanks for the info on SimplySurf. Doesn't sound good.

As for other options, I've been with Xplornet for almost 2 years (and with Storm and Arryba before that)... but you know that if you've been reading my blog. I had a few bumps with Xplornet in the first few months I was with them, but since getting their 3.5GHz, 3Mbps service, I've been pretty happy. I do work from home at least one day a week, and download speeds haven't really been an issue. Just today, I downloaded 25 MB in ~1 minute, which consider I had two PCs using my connection at the time is pretty good (in my opinion). I'm not sure how big your software images are; I can understand your concerns if they're bigger than 100 MB. BTW, I never signed a 3-yr contract with Xplornet; I originally signed a 1-yr contract with them, but since that expired, I've been going month-to-month -- same monthly costs. And as far as I know, no download limits (i.e. GB/month).

Roger's Rocket Hub has gotten a few good reviews here on my blog, plus I spoke with someone from Renfrew who was very happy with it. The download limits might be problematic if your software image downloads are large. You'd have to determine that for yourself.

I did try Bell's Sympatico Unplugged but couldn't get a strong enough signal here in Manotick/Kars.

Let me know what you choose, and how it goes. I'm sure lots of readers would be very interested.

-Chris

July 29, 2010 8:12 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I also live in West Carleton and use SimplySurf. Service is extremely unreliable and support/service is non existent. I can live with the occasional outage, but no service at all is not acceptable. One of my neighbours, who was also using SimplySurf, got feed up and dropped them. Problem is that he couldn’t contact them to tell them he had switched to Xplornet, he just had to cancel the monthly payments. From what I hear about Xplornet, not sure they’re a better option. I am just waiting for a better solution and I’ll drop SimplySurf too, just can’t wait.

PA

July 29, 2010 9:10 pm  
Blogger Chris Spencer said...

Hey PA,

Depending on signal strengths in your exact area, Xplornet or Rogers Rocket Hub may be your best options, at least based on comments made on this blog in the last 6-8 months. Rogers seems to have steady speeds but has download limits. Xplornet has no limits but their speeds may be more bursty. I haven't had much feedback on Bell's wireless service, so I can't comment one way or the other on it.

-Chris

July 30, 2010 8:13 am  
Anonymous Phossilfest said...

I live in Rockland outside of cable or DSL alternatives. I found Explornet expensive. After complaining to Rogers last winter about lack of 3G service at my home (which is in sight of their tower!)they fixed that issue. A few months ago Rogers announced tethering was available so I connected up my Iphone and voila ~2Mbps service. Appetite whetted for high-speed when the phone is gone, I looked into the Rogers Hub. I chose it because it was $5 month or so cheaper than Bell, and I was already a customer. Because of the large demand I got on a waiting list. A couple of weeks later in mid-July I got the call and picked it up. I have the new white, wide, rabbit-ear Netcomm version rather than the black tall Ericsson version. Installation was very simple and for the most part it was plug in, log-on, and surf. (Because my desktop had been hardwired to a Linksys router with a few custom settings, it took an hour or so of tinkering to reset it to hardwire with the Netcomm. My printer, iPhone, and laptop each were connected in under a minute.)
During the day I'll get downspeeds up to 4Mbps and upspeeds to 2 Mbps. During the evening I'll get 2Mbps down and 1Mbps up. Latency varies from 50 to 300 ms. I normally have 3G and High signal strength lights lit. A few times with very slow internet response I have switched the Netcomm power off/on and it rebooted and cleared in a couple of minutes with no problem. I also had some initial teething pains with the two ethernet connection ports (printer/desktop) suddenly not recognizing a connection, light off, then magically connecting and lighting up again. This hasn't recurred in a while. I do not expect to reach the 3G/month limit which is part of the basic Hub plan. I also continue to tether on my laptop as I have the 6G/month iPhone plan available, plus signal strength to the Netcomm drops off pretty quickly after 30 feet or so. I am not a gamer so can't comment on how the Hub works with those requirements. I considered switching my home phone to the Hub. I decided against it because of several issues with my burglar alarm (power outages disable calls to monitoring station; would require rewiring at telephone junction box so alarm system retains outgoing call priority) and loss of my long-distance calling plan. Overall I am quite satisfied with the improvement in service from 44Kbps dial-up. Reasonable speed for a reasonable price considering the alternatives.I recommend checking out Rogers or Bell Hubs for those in the wireless coverage areas.

August 04, 2010 10:08 pm  
Anonymous Geo in Metcalfe said...

Update - I've installed a high gain (directional) antenna with the Rocket Hub (NetComm version). It has definitely helped. I now get 3-4 bars (out of 5) with an RSCP around -84dBm.
What does this mean. Well, a test at speedtest.net gives an average of around 3.1 Mbps download & 2.0 Mbps upload (really impressed with the improve to upload speeds). The ping is consistent between 90 - 120 ms. This greatly improves both surfing and PS3 gaming. No dropped games or lag.
If you are going with the Rocket Hub in the rural area like myself, I would suggest the high gain antenna as it has made our signal much better and consistent. Use the cell tower map (http://www.ertyu.org/steven_nikkel/cancellsites.html) to find the nearest tower to point to.
Thanks for the site. I'll now keep it as one of the sites I visit to keep up to date (and share information) on rural Internet in the Ottawa area.

August 11, 2010 12:57 pm  
Anonymous Darryl Praill said...

Hi Chris,

I'm just down the road from you - Century Road East almost near Second Line South. For those not from the area - between Kars and Manotick.

I've had the hub since January. I ditched Xplornet and could not be happier! I know you had great speeds with them but they couldn't help me out - even with a 60ft TV tower already on my property. I went with every version of Line of Sight, and finally back to Satellite. Speeds sucked and were inconsistent. My poor kids could no longer play online gaming. Can you believe the humanity of such a thing?!

Anyways - have become a HUGE fan of the hub. I average between 3-6 Mb down and 1.5-3 MB up. Fantastic little device. I have it in my basement with an small external whip antenna attached to my attic vent on my bungalow's roof.

Like you, I work from home mostly and am a heavy user of data. I'll tell you what I don't miss about Xplornet - throttling and data caps. I can now load my large GPS updates to my iPhone (always over 1gb in size). I don't have to think about "How much have I downloaded today? Will I get FAP'd?" Having the extra phone line as part of the plan is bonus. We may still get rid of Bell but haven't yet as there is something about a POTS, on copper, always being alive that gives me peace of mind at night.

If you want to come on over and check it out sometime, just let me know and we can arrange a visit.

If anyone has any other questions, feel free to ask.

Cheers,

Darryl

August 17, 2010 12:24 am  
Anonymous dreadnot said...

Wow great info, Im running the netcom 3g10wvr, I was think of setting up a external high gain antenna or whip Im not getting about Received Signal Code Power(RSCP): -92 dBm Im about 10k to cell tower any ideas on a place to purchase one of them?

Thanks

August 19, 2010 10:12 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm just outside of Ashton.
Bell has confirmed that it has oversold their Wimax service, and has since June not been signing on new customers.

The alternatives are Xplornet or Bell/Rogers Turbo/Rocket Hub.

Needing 20GB a month, both their prices are literally insane, between $160 and $210 a month.

September 09, 2010 12:19 am  
Blogger Chris Spencer said...

AFAIK, Xplornet doesn't have any monthly download limits. But it's not as fast (peak) as Bell/Rogers HSPA+ networks. I've been with Xplornet for 2 years, and other than some initial issues in the first few months, my service has been trouble-free since then. You might want to check Xplornet's website.

-Chris

September 09, 2010 6:49 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great information on this blog! I am not from Ottawa, but in New Brunswick, Xplorenet has caps on data and you are very restricted. For $5.00 more I got the Rogers Hub with a phone line and I am going to try it tonight....they could not get me the newer model, but I am willing to get an antenna to boost signal...hoping for the best.

September 14, 2010 1:56 pm  
Blogger Wolfmaan said...

Xplorenet was the worst service I have ever encountered. I used them for 10 long years.

Tech support people were rude and unhelpful, and the daily download cap was infuriating at best.

They came out with these "restore tokens" which show up, but do not work in Canada.

The service with only 300mb per day download cap (8 youtube videos and you're spent) and bad customer support will run you over $120.00 per month!

The Rogers hub is $80.00 a month for the same service, and includes a home phone line.

My first two days of the Rogers hub have been frustrating. When I connect my laptop to the hub it knocks out internet connection and I keep having to reset the modem.

I am going to ring tech support and see if there is anything that can be done. The external antennas will add another $200.00 for the price of the service if you buy a good one.

September 15, 2010 10:50 pm  
Blogger Chris Spencer said...

@Wolfmaan

If you had Xplornet for 10 years, then I suspect you had their satellite internet service. I can't comment on that.

In my experience over the past two years, Xplornet's fixed wireless service is pretty good. And I've always found their customer support staff to be polite and helpful (even if the Tier 1 support reps are often obviously following a script). I'm not aware of any download cap; I've on occasion downloaded files over 500 MB without issue.

-Chris

September 16, 2010 9:13 pm  
Blogger FireFox said...

Hi Chris,

Thought I would drop by and follow up on my SimplySurf migration.

After weighing all the options available, I decided to take a shot on the Rogers Portable Internet service since I was able to acquire an external modem for the service second hand for next to nothing and I could sign up for the service without any contract (other than the typical 30 day cancellation notice).

I talked to lots of neighbours who signed up with Explornet, and they seemed happy enough with it - but they had the same typical internet access complaints -- good during the day and then it gets sluggish and slow in the evenings. I was able to bring my laptop over to a neigbours house to try it out a few times, and yes it seemed good in the afternoon, but the evening speeds were pretty bas -- way worse than SimplySurf. The 3 year contract and throttling to 600 kbps after 30 seconds of download were the nails in the coffin for me. Do you know if you have the 3.65 Ghz regulated modem for your explornet service ? I think that this is what explornet refers to as their "Enhanced" service and its not clear in their terms of service if the throttling applies on this service.

Long story short, I was able to get the Rogers modem talking with one of the local towers at a decent signal strength and have been running it since the beginning of August. It started out decent enough (again, slower in the evening for sure) and had a hiccup in the middle of the month. Then it seems that something changed on Sept 1st and its been quite usable since. Its pretty good for a VPN connection for work during the day and I have downloaded some larger files in the early AM at the rated 2mbps. Works for me, and while SimplySurf was cheaper $-wise, the Rogers connection is more reliable.

I would have preferred the RocketHub solution, but the download limits would have been tight for my family I think, add in the contract and higher startup cost, and I decided to take a chance on the older tech.

Thanks for listening.

Fox

September 22, 2010 3:23 pm  
Anonymous Xplornet is keyser soze said...

I'm running 3.5 Ghz Xplornet wireless for just over a year. Was on their top package spending $100 a month. Needed the speed as I work from home approx 2 times a week and I deal with large files. But truly in all my years of internet service Xplornet quality is just simply terrible. So inconsistent. I have called many times and talked to tier1, tier2, and tier3 tech support. Although very nice and friendly people nobody could give me any real answers to the wild inconsistencies I was getting. The most common answer was overloaded tower. So I downgraded my package and receive an additional monthly rebate as nobody could figure out my issue. I'm in Orono perched high up on a hill above the surrounding trees. I have a line of site to three high speed towers. So you would think I would be the ideal candidate. But ping times are so erratic that getting consistent speeds is next to impossible. I now drive into work more often because the network is unreliable. Only time I can get a clean connection is usually after 1am or first thing in the morning. As for gamers...just forget about it. Nasty, nasty lag spikes that come and go. The one good thing I can say for Xplornet is the no cap limit...that's the only thing worth mentioning. Like I said above I move large files back and forth for work....so Bell and Rogers would be expensive as I would easily go over their bandwidth limits. So I sit and painfully wait for a new company or better service to come my way....and I hope it comes SOON!

October 06, 2010 4:32 pm  
Anonymous Mark said...

I live west of Ottawa and after hearing the horror stories of Xplornet I went with a Rocket Hub. I was told by the salespeople that there was a $50 maximum over usage fee and I knew my usage patterns were in line with around 70GB/month so I worked it out that it was the best deal. After 3 months I've now received a letter from Rogers telling me that my usage is unacceptable and if I continue my service will be terminated. I just wanted to post this as a warning to any others that were thinking that the Rocket Hub would be an acceptable home internet solution in rural areas, because it certainly if you're a power user.

October 07, 2010 5:20 pm  
Anonymous Xplornet is keyser soze said said...

Thanks Mark good to know!!! The Rogers Hub was an option I was considering especially hearing about the $50 over usage fee. "Over usage" fee for a limited time only I guess? After spending $350 for a hook up for Xplornet I certainly would hate to switch only to get the boot after a few short months. I think I'm going to have to move back to the city :)

October 07, 2010 6:36 pm  
Anonymous Leo said...

Like so many on this forum, I too am an ex-SimplySurf customer. What a waste of what would have been a leader in wireless in west Carleton. The service call response was the worst it could have been but the the mesh technology worked extremely well.
When I lost my access point, the neighbor moved and took his CB tower with him, I was forced to start from Scratch. I fist tried Bell's hub and then the stick but even though the signal was there the latency was so bad it made it unusable. I was having ping rates to Montreal of 800ms.
I then called xPlorenet. I talked to the rep on the phone and asked some specific questions as to where the towers were that services Corkery, what frequencies they were equipped to handle and what the subscription rate for each one was. She was very informative and informed me that the 900 and 2.4 in the area were at full capacity but that the 3.5 had some room still. She also said there were no immediate plans to upgrade the equipment to handle more subscribers.
I then called the installer she recommended and arranged for a site survey. I was amazed that it consisted of a guy strolling about my roof with a 900mhz antenna in his hand. This of course allowed him to tell me that there wasn't a strong signal. Gee, I could have told him that. He had no pole and not much of anything else with him. He called his boss..and the reply was that his boss would call me. Huh ?
So, I got the call. He recommended that I put a 10 foot tripod on my roof and 30 ft of mast above it which made the cable run about 75 feet. This should cost about $1200 in his estimate. I asked for a proper site survey from which he could give me stats on the quality of signal and that I wanted to be on the 3.5ghz tower only. Then he proceeded to tell me that if they came to test this system and got a signal they would continue with the installation regardless. You can guess where xPlorenet rates now.
End result I tested Rogers 3g hub ( NetComm 3G10WVR ) and was pleased with the initial signal strength and ping rate ( now 140ms compared to bell's 800) so I signed up for their flex plan. I then added 50 feet of low loss antenna cable, an enclosed yagi antenna from the Source on a home made 10 foot mast that I inserted in SimplySurf's installed used bell dish arm and my signal strength is maxed out, the ping is 60ms.

My hardware including the hub, antenna, cable and galvanized pipe is less than $500. My monthly bill starts at $35 and won't go above the max of $60.
So when I am less active on the internet I don't pay for it and I don't have to stay ip till 3 in the morning to use xPlorenet.

If anyone finds Shadi, tell him he blew a perfect opportunity and to quit trying to bill me for a service I haven't had in 4 months.

October 12, 2010 1:14 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have owned a Rogers RocketHub, the Ericsson W35 version, for seven months. To those who wish to purchase either the Rogers or the Bell variant, be aware that they currently have an issue where you lose Internet connectivity sporadically. Voice communications is not affected.
There appears to be a problem with either the firmware or the cellular network, or both. There is no official acknowledgement from Rogers that this problem exists. Apparently Bell has an open ticket on the issue without making any statements on when/if resolution is coming.

See the Ericsson forum website: http://fwt.ericsson.net/index.php for extensive reporting of the details and of user problems with the W35 device.

skinorth

November 16, 2010 10:54 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

We're located near Dunrobin. I got a Rogers NetComm Rocket Hub -- Rogers say they're discontinuing the Ericsson W35.

With 3 bars, we did achieve HSPDA/HSPA/EDGE connectivity so RF-wise, it looked good.

Sadly, the speed was slower than dial-up. Speeds in the up-direction were as low as 8 Kbps. The down direction maxed out at about 20 Kbps.

I spent some time with Rogers tech support, (a Canadian person) who told me the "there is significant data congestion in Southern Ontario [on the 3G network]". He was not surprised with my speed results.

The wireless data signals also dropped out rather often, with huge data dropouts lasting many seconds.

= = =

My next-door neighbor has a Bell Ericsson W35 Hub and is getting a solid 3 Mbps (and above) up and down, both in Dunrobin and at their cottage near White Lake.

My concern with the Bell service is there is no cap on charges -- $60 gives you 10 GB, then, $15.00/GB thereafter -- with no maximum dollar cap!

Bell does have a datastick service available with unlimited data use but that costs ca. $500.00 per month (whether one uses one or 100 GB).

November 24, 2010 10:33 am  
Blogger Bug Master said...

Hi, a bit late for comments, but here's my experience...

I have the Netcomm 3g10wvr from Rogers. The service is quite good for me. Last year I was located in the rural region of Quebec city and 3G connection was great.

One thing I discovered lately from Rogers: When going over 10G of data, they will charge you 10$/G after that. But they will only charge you for 5 more Gigs... After that, it is unlimited... I was pleasantly surprised to see that I had been charged 15G when I had used 18G in a month...

I talked to Rogers about that to validate if I would have a big surprise and they confirmed me that they do not advertise it but the max charged will be only for 15G total... That means that my plan (data+phone) is costing 125$/month maximum...

So now I use Netflix a lot, and never worry about cost :)

April 15, 2011 5:09 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi, I realize my comments are also outdated but thought I would share my experience all the same.

I live in the Corkery area of Carp and was too, a Simply Surf customer, or rather, victim. When they discontinued their service I decided to try the Rogers Rocket Hub (3G10WVR). At the risk of jinxing myself, I am pleased to say that I have had a great experience with the Hub since I started using it in August of 2010. I frequently stream tv shows with no issue and interruptions are rare. This is contrary to my experience with Simply Surf where the connection was very slow, unreliable and frequently inexistant, despite the rooftop receiver. I did not buy any other equipment to boost the signal to my Hub (signal strength has only ever been medium) and it still works better than what I had.

I pay approx. $53/month (tax, fees in) for 5GB and then sometimes I end up paying $70 for the next tier up. I don't mind the higher cost compared to Simply Surf because the service and connection is simply much better. I highly recommend the Hub.

May 09, 2011 10:26 am  
Blogger Unknown said...

We arrived in Almonte last year and were facing the internet problem as well. So after shopping around all the companies i opted for the rocket hub. the first months were not that great, mainly because of poor signal quality. after buiding my own antenna, dirt cheap, we were able to gain a steady signal of about 75% strength almost all the time. still the advertised transfer rate was far from being reached. we live only 2.3 km from the tower. Anyways, i frequently test my bandwith pass and never exceeded 2500 upload or download. Still we have been using it for a year now and are satisfied with this service for now but are definetly hoping to get read high speed interned in the future. Looking at the service availability map i noticed that they now offer 4g in our sector. i am gonna call roger soon and asked them if my w35 can be upgraded to 4g. that would be nice! keep up the good blog, after reading you all, i realized that i had inadvetly made the right choice after all!

May 17, 2011 8:02 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home